Why do we need a better way to code English
speech?
Why do we need a closer correspondence between
pronunciation and spelling?
In a true alphabet, all the letters have a
sound. We may ask:
What sound is associated with A in the traditional
English writing system? [TO] We can't say for sure because the English
TO is polyvalent. Each vowel letter is associated with six more more
sounds and each sound can be spelled over 20 different ways. [see how many
ways
can you spell the sound in day].
POLYVALENCE [many
values] AND CODE OVERLAP
In the TO, each
letter is associated with a variety of sounds in English
In
a phonemic system, each important sound has a unique mark or symbol.
| Traditional |
IPA |
traditional |
IPA |
Spanglish |
SS |
Unifon |
|
A
|
ae |
CAT |
kaet |
catt |
a. |
A |
| a: |
BATH |
baaq |
baath |
aa |
X |
| a:' |
ARE |
aar |
aar |
aar |
XR |
| ey |
ABLE |
eibl |
eybl |
ey |
L |
|
QUALITY
WATER |
kwoliti:
kw liti: w t' |
quaality
kwolity wotr |
aa
o |
X
o |
:
|
ALL walk |
ool l
w lk |
aol wolk |
ao |
X |
| e' |
CARE air |
ke'r fe'r |
caer /feyr |
ae/ey |
A |
| ' |
AGO equal |
'gou i:kw'l |
agow equal |
a |
c |
The turned c was adopted by IPA to avoid misinterpretation. In Spanglish
o always equals awe unless the trailing consonant is
doubled. bottle = bottl = baatl
ai bot a bottl av scotch
wisky. [the extra consonant is needed to change awe to ah].
Many words that would normally be represented with the Italian A were
shifted to o
Polyvalence means that the same letter represents several didfferent
sounds and versa. Conversely the same sound is represented by several
letters. The phoneme s can be spelt c in mice, s in send sc in scent
and ss in miss. Polyvalence of a much more serious proporiton was
discovered by Nyikos (1988). In a survey of common words, he found
80 different graphemes for the back V phoneme /u/ and 1,120 graphemes for
the 40 phonemes of English. [an average of 28 different sounes per letter].
This is nearly twice as many as Dewey [1969] located in his study of 70,000
words and probably indicates a larger sample and a different methodology.
English illustrates that a writing system does not nead to be fully
alphabetic. It does not need to graphically represent [re-present]
the phonological structure of speeh.
The consistency of english stops at the word level. There is also
some morphological consistency, e.g. plural endings are s and es even if
the pronunciation is z and ez.
Letters and Associated
Sounds
|
Letter
|
lst
sound
|
2nd
sound
|
3rd
saund
|
overlaps
|
combinations
|
R-comb.
|
|
a
|
/a:/ alms
|
'a /'/
up
|
ae ash at
|
ae, 'a, ei, o
|
ai, au, aw
|
ar are
|
|
e
|
e /e
/
elbow
|
'e, 'er
/'/
|
ei/ey
|
'r 'a
|
ei ew eu eau
|
/er/ eric,
air
|
|
i
|
/I/ bit, ill
|
/i:/ beat,
eel
|
/ai/
my mice
|
schwa-schwi
|
ia iu via few
|
ir /ir/ ear
|
|
o
|
awe: all cost
|
owe: oat bow
|
haat hot
|
au, ou, aa
|
ow, oa
|
or ow'r
|
|
u
|
guru pool
|
put book
|
up
cut / L
/
|
u, ^, 3: w
|
ou, iu, eu
|
ur tour
|
| w v |
|
/u/ hook |
/^/ up cup |
|
|
|
| y |
unstressed
/ i:/ |
'y = ai in fl'y |
|
|
|
|
|
b
|
/b/ bib
|
/v/
|
/p/
|
debt
|
bl, bq, br
|
b'rg berg
|
|
c
|
/k/
|
/s/ circl
|
ch /tsh/
cello
|
k, s, ch, sh
|
ci, ce, ca, co
|
c'rd curd
|
|
d
|
/d/
|
/dh/
|
t
|
dh
|
da de di du
|
d'r'abl
|
|
f
|
/f/
|
/v/
|
--
|
v
|
fif of ofn
|
f'r
|
With three sounds per vowel letter, the notation is still manageable as
long as there are no code overlaps. We want the sound code or script
to be streamlined and short. The first sound does not refer to frequency
but to a default pronunciation that could be understood by all. ahp
can still be understood as up. ahx [ox] can almost be understood
as ax. caer however is not car.
New
Section
Definitions - draft see
alfa-gloss
for something more polished
syllabary
alphabet
phoneme
in linguistics, the
smallest unit of speech distinguishing one word (or
word element) from
another. For example, sound [t] in "cat"
separates that word
from "cab," "cap," and "can." Variants which are
understood as instances
of a particular phoneme are called allophones.
It is possible to
understand people speaking different dialects because
we can ignore the
phonetic distinctions and acoustical variations and
concentrate on the
phonemic similarities.
Most languages get
by with less than 30 phonemes. English has 35
uncombined phonemes
but around 50 important sound categories evenly
divided between vowels
and consonants. In a perfect alphabet, there would be a
one to one correspondnece
between phonemes of speech and distinctive
visible marks. A
writing system based on such a code would
be referred to as
phonemic or alphabetic.
msj
Phonics and Spelling
Improvement
To what extent can phonics improve spelling?
Phonics refers to the isolation
of patterns of consistent sound representation in the English writing system.
Wijk showed that the English writing system uses 106 symbols to represent
the 40 or so sounds in the language. In other words you should be able
to spell every word in English using 26 letters in just 106 different combinations.
This sounds like an instant recipe for spelling success until you realize
that most of the 106 symbols represent more than one sound.
Here is the polyvalence [multiple
values] found in the first letter in the alphabet. .
| Traditional |
IPA |
traditional |
IPA |
Saxon* |
SS |
Uni |
IPA |
|
A
|
ae |
CAT |
kaet |
catt |
a. |
A |
a |
| a: |
BATH |
baaq |
baath |
aa |
X |
aa |
| a:' |
ARE |
aar |
aar |
aar |
XR |
aar |
| ey |
ABLE |
eibl |
eybl |
ey |
L |
ae |
|
QUALITY
WATER |
kwoliti:
kw liti: w t' |
quaality
kwolity wotr |
aa
o |
X
o |
aa
o |
:
|
ALL walk |
ool l w lk |
aol wolk |
ao |
X |
o |
|
pawl caught |
pcl kct |
pol cot cost |
o |
X |
au |
|
| e' |
CARE air |
ke'r fe'r |
caer /feyr |
ae/ey |
A |
air |
| ' |
AGO equal |
'gou i:kw'l |
agow equal |
a |
c |
u |
The turned c was adopted by
IPA to avoid misinterpretation. The ambiguity of the turned c is
due not to the code but to the pronunciation variation in different
dialects of English. The british Take three words bother father water
The british do no rhyme bother and father.
Phonic awareness, therefore
has to include all of the sound that can be associated with each vowel
letter. Sometimes there is a cue given by the consonant. al
has only two means either ael or ol.
as in Al
almost caught the animal. won the race.
Most of these symbols represent
more than one sound. There is a code overlap. This means that
Phonics can be an aid in sounding out words
In an ideal alphabetic writing
system, one can easily spell any word that can be correctly pronounced.
This is because the writing system accurately maps the phonological structure
of the language. It is possible to create such a code for English.
A number of such codes have
been developed but have never caught on except for use as a pronunciation
guide in the dictionary. The basic reason is that any phonemic code
will respell 60% or more of the words in the language.
This statement can quickly
be checked by going to the dictionary and picking 20 words at random.
Count the number of times the pronunciation guide spelling matches the
traditional spelling. If you found more than 8 words that matched,
you are better than average.
I hav obviusly missd out
on some emails about this, as I do
not know about Eigoji, altho
we used romaji in lerning Korean.
Curiusly, if u tested English
speakers with both
the Romaji and Eigoji spellings
below, in a proper cross-over
design, I reckon u would
find that most English speakers could read
the romaji much faster,
both silently and aloud, and with no
more mistakes, exept perhaps
with Kato pronounced like Cato.
vy
David writes:
>Well, if I asked my students
to write their family names in Romaji (i.e.
according to the so-called
"Roman" system of vowels and consonants),
they might write:
>Shimizu
Nomura
Kato
Yamamoto
Oki
>But if I asked them to write
the same names in Eigoji (i.e. according to
the so-called "English"
system of vowels and consonants), they might
write the same words as:
>Sheemeezoo
Noemoorah
Kahtoe
Yahmahmoetoe
Ohkee
|