| Draft
cphonology-course.html
Toward an Introductory Web
Course in
Grapho-Phonology and
Applied Linguistics
Draft
- A project of the Saundspel egroup contact
Whether you are for or against
a specific spelling reform, a certain amount of background is required
for an informed opinion. This short course is designed to provide
that background.
This course was developed
as a collaborative project of the Saundspel
and Simplified Spelling on-line discussion groups. It is still a
work in progress so if you have any expertise and talent in this area,
please join the saundspel
egroup and send us your ideas and opinions.
When finished, this Web course
on phonology and orthography could be used as an entry requirement for
participation on this discussion board. It will never come to that
but there probably are cases where people would like to have more of a
background in order to be more than a lurker.
Your ideas on what should
be included in the course are welcomed. These could be in the form
of a test
question. Some of
the proposed test questions are listed below:
 
Key
concepts
alphabet definition
sound sign - phonogram
pronuciation and spelling
phoneme see spanglish
phonemes discussion
broad and narrow transcriptions
- phonemic and phonetic notations
writing system [orthography,
spelling system]
history of spelling [old
english (saxon), middle english, modern english]
Recommended Readings:
Bett, S. and Kelley,
D. Alphabets, Codes, Spelling, & Pronunciation [in preparation]
Pitman,
J. Alphabets and Reading [out of print but can be found in libraries]
Crystal, D. Encyclopedia
of the English Language, Cambridge
Crystal, D. An encyclopedic
dictionary of language and linsguistics
Coulmas, F.
Blackwell
[bibliography]
[Yule
bibliography] [books on..]
Skip
the test for now
TEST
YOUR KNOWLEDGE of Grapho-Phonology and Applied Lingistics
quiz
These
are difficult questions to formulate because the numbers often depends
on the dialect and the how one determines the minimum.
1. How many letters
are there in the [English] alphabet? 20 24
26 28 30 [answr]
.
2. How many
distinctive sounds [phonemes] are there in English speech
< 30 35 40 42
42 >
3. How many
ways are the letters of the alphabet associated with the sounds of speech?
In an ideal system, there would be a one-to-one correspondence: 35
sounds - 35 symbols.
In the traditional English writing system, how many orthographic options
are there?
24 26 30 40 50 72 100 200 400
500 over 500
4. How many ways
can you spell the vowel /u:/ in RULE?
9 14 18 24
over 25 [answr]
5. How many
symbols [sound signs] are there in the traditional English orthography
- counting digraphs?
26 30 50 72 106 200 300
6. How
can you represent all the sounds in the alphabet with a limited character
set?
a. by letting each letter to represent more than one sound. [e.g.,
a
= ae, ah, uh / at, are, ago ]
b. by using a marker: letter markers [digrafs-Ch] or
with accents and diacritics [Š] =Sh
c. by using the upper case to extend the numbe of sound signs [e.g., S=sh,
C=ch, R=er, L=el]
d. by augmenting the alpabet with about 18 new characters [see Avinor's
new fonts]
e. any of the above
7. How many pure
(uncombined) vowels are there in General American speech?
8. How many pure
(uncombined) vowels are there in educated british speech [RP]?
9. Describe three
pronunciations that are different in GA and RP.
10. Describe how these
would be handled [or ignored] in your preferred orthographic system.
11. Does spelling reform
imply a pronunciation reform? (yes, no, explain)
12. What was the impact
of the "Great vowel
shift"? When did this pronunciation change take place?
[please
send in your suggestions for additions or for rewrites]
Related
Web pages [index
page]
For some background, read this humorous article by Justin Rye
Use the back button on your browser to return to this page
KEY to the
conventions used in this course
Throughout this course,
example spellings, pronunciation guides and so forth are marked out as
follows... |
| English words, letters etc: |
angle-bracketted |
<like this> |
| Foreign words, letters etc: |
ditto, italicised |
<comme ceci> |
| Proposed revised spellings: |
double-bracketted |
«layk dhis» |
| Rough pronunciation guides: |
capitalised in quotes |
"LYKE THISS" |
| Phonemic transcriptions: |
ASCII IPA in slant-brackets |
/lAIk DIs/ |
THE PRINCIPLES OF SPELLING REFORM
By Henry Sweet (1845-1910) Oxford
University Press, 1900
Introduction
General principles
Terminology
Nomic - traditional
Romic - reformed
Glossic - English value
system
|
Choice
of letters
& values for best represetation
of speech sounds
Transition
from and to the present
spelling
|
Vowels
representation
R and its
modifications
Unaccented
vowels (schwa)
|
Consonants
Accent and quality
List of English
symbols
New types
(fonts)
|
by the author of History
of English Sounds (Trübner), Henry Sweet
Written 100 years ago, it is
still the best statement of the task and options
DIAGRAMS
-
Vowel Diagram [Jones]
-
Vowel Chart
AN ALPHABET FOR ENGLISH
-
saxon
alphabet
-
Kelley's augmented alphabet
- 5 A symbols before going on to B
-
Unifon Alphabet [40 character]
Winglish [world english] phonograms
[chart]
SPELLING PRONUNCIATION
ROMAN, augmented roman or non-roman
[Shavian] scripts
compared
HISTORY
OF SPELLING
Writing samples
IPA notation highly
modified without the turned c or S or tS. /ae/ becomes
ä
and /'i:/ becomes ee
Sweet's
version of the Int'l Phonetic Alphabet |
Spanglish assigns
up to two sounds per letter which results in some ambiguity which can be
avoided only through the use of diacritics. |
| '
dispyoot wüns 'roaz
bitween dh'
wind 'nd dh'
sün, wich w'z
dh' strongg'r
'v
dh' too, 'nd
dhai
'greed
t' put dh'
point on dhis ishoo, dh't
wichev' soonist
maid ' trävl'
taik of hiz kloak, shud bee ''kountid
dh' mau pou'ful.
dh' wind bigän,
'nd
bloo widh aul hiz meit 'nd
main' blast, koald 'nd
fi's'z
'
thraish'n staum;
b't dh' strongg' hee bloo dh' kloas' dh' trävl' räpt hiz kloak
'round him, 'nd dh' teit' hee graspt it widh hiz händz. dhen
broak out dh' sün: widh hiz welk'm beemz hee dispoest dh' vaip'r
'nd dh' koald; dh' trävl' felt dh' jeeny'l waumth, 'nd 'z dh' sün
shon breit'r 'nd breit', hee sät doun, oav'küm widh dh' heet,
'nd kast hiz kloak on dh' ground. |
A dispiut
wans arowz bitwin the wind and the sun, which was the stronger ov the tu,
and they agrid tu put the point on this ishu, that whichever sunist meid
the travler teik of hiz cloak, shud bi acounted the mor paurful.
The wind bigan, and blu with ol hiz mait and meid a blast, coald and fiers
as a threishen storm; but the stronger hi blu, the clowsr the travler rapt
hiz clowk araund him, and the taiter hi graspt it with hiz handz.
Then browk aut the sun: with hiz welcam bimz hi dispoazd the vapor and
the cowld; the travler felt the jinyal warmth and az the sun shown braiter
and braiter, hi sat daun, overcam with the hit, and kast hiz cloak on the
graund. |
| Sweet experimented with
a wide variety of notations, I do not think that this was his best. He
was trying to get as close to TES as possible. |
Which notation is easier
to read?
Which is easier to pronounce
aloud? |
DIALECTS OF ENGLISH
One of the problems encountered
by those trying to improve the connection between speech and
spelling (symbol and sound),
is how to deal with the various dialects of English.
David Kelly has created a
useful set of diagrams contrasting two speech patterns sometimes called
rhotic and non rhotic accents
or R and R-drop dialects. The contrast words in the diagram are
burr and rubber which in
RP is / b' / and / r^b' /.
In North American, there
is no distinction between the vowel in alms and pot. [aalmz, paat]
In RP there is. Pot
is pronounced very close to the pronciation of paw + t. It is a short
and snappy /aw/ not a drawn out one as in paw. Sweet used [ao] to
reference this sound. World English uses [oo]
General
American compared to educated british [RP]
|
GA
|
RP
|
| far |
fa |
ore
/our/
oh-r |
or
/o:'/
aw-uh |
fire
/fair/
fah-ee-r |
fire
/fa /
fah... |
|
|
GA
|
RP
|
| far |
fa |
ore
/our/
oh-r |
or
/o:'/
aw-uh |
fire
/fair/
fah-ee-r |
fire
/fa /
fah... |
|
| TES |
GA |
RP
|
| burr |
b'r |
b' |
| rubber |
r'b-'r |
r'b-' |
| pot |
pa:t |
po:t |
| pot |
paaht |
pawt |
|
| TES |
GA |
RP
|
| father |
fa:th'r |
fa:th' |
| bother |
ba:th'r
bah-th'r |
botha
bawth' |
| fire |
fa:ir
fah-ee-r |
fa:'
fah-uh |
|
[I need some more good examples]
..
writing-systems.htm
romanji-tabl.htm
David Kelley wrote:
Well, even though I have been involved with RP-speaking people for
years, and know a little about how that variety of English differs
from
my own, it still isn't easy to pinpoint all the differences with such
kinds of tables (or show such things as vowel raising, etc.).
But I
think I managed to show some of the major ones on the attached table.
I
hope it will be of some small use to you.
|