An orthography for English is simply a way
to code the 12
pure vocalic phonemes and 22 pure consonant phonemes of speech.
The simplest code is an alphabetic one.
An alphabetic code allows the 12 pure
vowels to be combined to form diphthongs or blended vowels. In
addition to the 12 uncombined vowels, there are about 20 vowel combinations
(diphthongs)
in common use.
With a simple code, FILE
would be spelled [fah-eel], TAPE would be spelled [teh-eep] and TOWN would
be spelled [tah-oon]. These sounds are all vowel glides or blends
commonly referred to as diphthongs (Greek, 2 sounds).
Instead, FILE is spelled
fill-eh (as in filet) and TAPE is spelled tap-eh (as in tappet).
TOWN is actually a viable spelling [taw-uun] the problem is that the spelling
could be pronounced tone (tow+n) or (t+own). In fact this was the
way it was pronounced before 1400. ow and ou, originally [oh], are
essentially the same but all words containing these digraphs do not rhyme.
About half of the words with this spelling shifted. The vowel in
TOWN and OUT came to be pronounced /au/ as in kraut.
Pronunciation dictionaries
will spell these words FILE /fail/, FAIL/feil/, TAPE /teip/,
TOWN /taun/, TONE /toun/. The IPA digraphs (shown in
bold face) are simple combinations of the single letter grapheme-phoneme
correspondences.
To avoid contradictions,
IPA adds a few new letters such as the schwa [
]
and hook were added. Other letters such as the turned c [
]
were added primarily to avoid confusion. If o was always associated
with the sound in [awe] and never [oh] or [ah] there would be no need to
add a special [
] character.
The stragety doesn't always work since the letter patterns in FAIL
and OUT already have traditional or historical interpretations:
They are associated with the sounds /feil/ and /aut/.
The problem with logical
spelling is that they collide with traditional spelling [fah-eel]
would be spelled in Spanglish and IPA as fail.
FAIL would be spelled [feh-eel] or feil. These two shifted sounds
are among the most problematic in the traditional spelling of English.
See the number of ways to spell the sound in DAY.
Speech cannot be fully reduced
to graphic representation. However, a writing system can capture
enough cues to enable native speakers to reproduce it. The goal of
reform spelling has been to index speech sounds in such a way that non-native
speakers who know the sounds associated with the letters can read it aloud
and be understood. This is possible with the orthographies of other
languages such as Spanish.
It also works when the orthography
used for Spanish is used to transcribe English speech sounds. When this
is done, one ends up with a set of spellings that are just as consistent
as those in Spanish [see Spanglish].
The problem is that while we can read these spellings, they often look
odd when matched with historical spellings. [see fail
and teip above]
Learning how to pronounce
strings of letters on a page is facilitated by having some consistent relationship
between the graphemes and the phonemes (or significant speech sounds).
Learning an inconsistent code is possible but it takes longer. Decoding
(reading) takes so long that some people never learn to do it well.
Encoding (spelling) is even more difficult. Most English readers
cannot spell unfamiliar words in the inconsistent traditional code without
the aid of a dictionary or spell checker. [See
Valerie Yule's Spelling Test]
Even when keyed with IPA
as below, many of those interested in orthography have a difficult time
understanding notations other than the one they are accustom to.
Some of those on the Spelling Mailing List have suggested taping conversations
so that "we can sound the phonemes in the dubious cases." Ian and
Paul think that this would be a good idea. The audio clips below
are the next best thing. [See also the audio
clips for old and middle English which are essentially the same as Spanglish]
Vowel
Chart - 15k gif file - This compact chart is keyed
to the multiple notation chart below. It shows all of the vowel phonemes
and the graphemes used by Chekt Spelling. The abbreviated chart below shows
the same arrangement of graphemes-phoneme correspondences for UNiGRaF.